header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / Ruth Pratt
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Features , Artificial intelligence , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

Lawyers using AI—where are we at?

245638
Helpful assistant or laden with unknown traps? Ruth Pratt considers recent thoughts on AI for lawyers
  • Considers the main points to take away from the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce draft Legal Statement on Liability for AI Harms and the Civil Justice Council’s interim report and consultation on the Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents.

Both the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (UKJT) and the Civil Justice Council (CJC) have recently published consultations on the use of artificial intelligence (AI). What should we as lawyers make of the ideas discussed? Do either of these consultations give us more certainty or clarity on our use of AI?

UKJT draft legal statement

This consultation was published in January by the UKJT, which is part of LawtechUK, an initiative backed by the Ministry of Justice. The draft Legal Statement on Liability for AI Harms seeks to address the tricky conundrum of AI and liability. It considers the questions of, in what circumstances, and on what legal bases, will English common law impose liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
Prosecutors will speed up preparations for charging hate crimes, under Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) guidance issued in response to the surge in antisemitic incidents
Improvements to courts, tribunals and the wider justice system in the north are being held back by a lack of national and local collaboration, according to thinktank JUSTICE North
A family judge has criticised the prison authorities for mistakenly freeing a father who abducted his own son
The Law Society has renewed its calls for compensation for legal aid firms affected by the cyber-attack on the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has secured a £10m penalty plus £4.8m in costs from manufacturer Ultra Electronics Holdings, under the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) for failure to prevent bribery
back-to-top-scroll