header-logo header-logo

Lawyers who make a difference: Sir Rupert Jackson

27 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-detail
Lawyers shouldn’t fear judges―they’re ‘gentle’ and like ‘teddy bears’. Those are the words of Sir Rupert Jackson, architect of the civil justice costs reforms (who also confesses he sometimes saw judges as ‘ogres’ when starting out). 

Sir Rupert retired from the Court of Appeal in 2018 after 20 years as a judge and now works from 4 New Square as a mediator and arbitrator.

Sir Rupert speaks to City Law Professor and NLJ columnist Dominic Regan about life on the bench and beyond, in the latest NLJ webinar on lawyers who make a difference. As a young barrister, Sir Rupert specialised in professional negligence, co-authoring the first textbook on the subject, and developed a practice in construction law. As a judge, he was introduced to several new fields of law, including murder trials and judicial reviews. He also provides a fascinating insight into the daily life of a Court of Appeal judge.

It is for his civil costs reforms, however, that Sir Rupert is best known. These reforms, implemented by the government in 2013, have transformed civil litigation. Here, he discusses the process and influences behind his radical proposals, which extend to costs budgeting, sanctions, hot-tubbing, fixed recoverable costs and other reforms.

Click here to watch the webinar in full.

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll