header-logo header-logo

Lawyers who make a difference: Sir Rupert Jackson

27 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-detail
Lawyers shouldn’t fear judges―they’re ‘gentle’ and like ‘teddy bears’. Those are the words of Sir Rupert Jackson, architect of the civil justice costs reforms (who also confesses he sometimes saw judges as ‘ogres’ when starting out). 

Sir Rupert retired from the Court of Appeal in 2018 after 20 years as a judge and now works from 4 New Square as a mediator and arbitrator.

Sir Rupert speaks to City Law Professor and NLJ columnist Dominic Regan about life on the bench and beyond, in the latest NLJ webinar on lawyers who make a difference. As a young barrister, Sir Rupert specialised in professional negligence, co-authoring the first textbook on the subject, and developed a practice in construction law. As a judge, he was introduced to several new fields of law, including murder trials and judicial reviews. He also provides a fascinating insight into the daily life of a Court of Appeal judge.

It is for his civil costs reforms, however, that Sir Rupert is best known. These reforms, implemented by the government in 2013, have transformed civil litigation. Here, he discusses the process and influences behind his radical proposals, which extend to costs budgeting, sanctions, hot-tubbing, fixed recoverable costs and other reforms.

Click here to watch the webinar in full.

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll