header-logo header-logo

Lawyers with disabilities "undermined"

30 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Law firms are failing to support their disabled employees, a major report has found

‘Legally disabled? The career experiences of disabled people working in the legal profession’, by the Law Society’s Disability Division and Cardiff University, published last week, found that disabled people are being excluded and undermined in their roles on a daily basis.

Many lawyers and paralegals choose to hide their disability when applying for jobs or not seek the reasonable adjustments they are entitled to under law.

Professor Debbie Foster from Cardiff University said: ‘Line managers and supervisors play a pivotal role in the reasonable adjustment process and in the management of sickness absence, performance management and promotion.  However, we found the quality of the relationship between line managers and disabled employees often depended on ‘good will’, ‘luck’ or personality.’

The report’s recommendations include: reserving some training places for disabled candidates; greater use of flexible and remote working; the introduction of disability pay gap reporting; and disability awareness training for staff and managers.

Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll