header-logo header-logo

LCJ reports to parliament

11 November 2020
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
The backlog of 50,000 cases in the Crown court will take years to clear, the Lord Chief Justice has indicated

Giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week, Lord Burnett said the increase since March, when the backlog stood at about 40,000 cases, was ‘very substantial indeed’. He pointed out that not all of those cases would result in trials and that the recovery plan target of 250 Crown court rooms by the end of October had been exceeded.

Last week, there were 255 Crown court rooms operating, he said, and he hoped to get to 300 by the end of this year.

However, he warned that ‘even if we were able to run those courts flat out, we would be retrieving the backlog only a little, maybe by 50 cases a week or that sort’. Moreover, as more police and CPS lawyers are being recruited, it is likely the number of cases coming through the courts will increase, he said.

There was now a ‘fairly good sense’ emerging of ‘the jurisdictions that lend themselves to remote justice and those that don’t’, Lord Burnett said. However, technology was ‘not a silver bullet’.

‘The overarching problem that we encounter in the courts, including in the Royal Courts of Justice, is that technology fails us…screens freezing, voices going completely unintelligible, squeaking on the line…the problem is it depends on the broadband of the weakest link’.

He called for ‘realistic’ funding, and was ‘extremely concerned to avoid the position of the backlog that has accumulated being viewed by anybody as a new normal.

‘Funding has got to be provided to help us deal with the work that comes in and the backlog,’ he said.

Lord Burnett was also asked by Sir Bob O’Neill, chair of the committee, about the Prime Minister and Home Secretary’s recent derogatory references to lawyers.

He said ‘the vitality and independence of the legal profession is an essential hallmark of the rule of law’, and ‘identifiable individual failings, unfortunate though they are, do not begin to justify a general attack on the integrity of groups of lawyers’.

Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll