header-logo header-logo

11 November 2020
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

LCJ reports to parliament

The backlog of 50,000 cases in the Crown court will take years to clear, the Lord Chief Justice has indicated

Giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week, Lord Burnett said the increase since March, when the backlog stood at about 40,000 cases, was ‘very substantial indeed’. He pointed out that not all of those cases would result in trials and that the recovery plan target of 250 Crown court rooms by the end of October had been exceeded.

Last week, there were 255 Crown court rooms operating, he said, and he hoped to get to 300 by the end of this year.

However, he warned that ‘even if we were able to run those courts flat out, we would be retrieving the backlog only a little, maybe by 50 cases a week or that sort’. Moreover, as more police and CPS lawyers are being recruited, it is likely the number of cases coming through the courts will increase, he said.

There was now a ‘fairly good sense’ emerging of ‘the jurisdictions that lend themselves to remote justice and those that don’t’, Lord Burnett said. However, technology was ‘not a silver bullet’.

‘The overarching problem that we encounter in the courts, including in the Royal Courts of Justice, is that technology fails us…screens freezing, voices going completely unintelligible, squeaking on the line…the problem is it depends on the broadband of the weakest link’.

He called for ‘realistic’ funding, and was ‘extremely concerned to avoid the position of the backlog that has accumulated being viewed by anybody as a new normal.

‘Funding has got to be provided to help us deal with the work that comes in and the backlog,’ he said.

Lord Burnett was also asked by Sir Bob O’Neill, chair of the committee, about the Prime Minister and Home Secretary’s recent derogatory references to lawyers.

He said ‘the vitality and independence of the legal profession is an essential hallmark of the rule of law’, and ‘identifiable individual failings, unfortunate though they are, do not begin to justify a general attack on the integrity of groups of lawyers’.

Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll