header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 July 2009 / Mike Willis , Naomi Park
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Lean litigation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Mike Willis & Naomi Park hope Jackson LJ’s drive for costs reform will encourage leaner & cleaner procedures

The procedural steps and options for reform being contemplated and examined by Lord Justice Jackson, as part of his wide-ranging review of costs in civil litigation, merit careful reflection by all legal professional advisers in civil contentious business. This is not only for their practical implications if procedural rules are relaxed or altered, but also for the new or additional civil liability risks and dilemmas they may create.
Two areas most prominently in need of re-examination and prospective reform, and illustrative of the problems, are:
pre-action procedures, now well embedded since the 1999 Woolf reforms; and
disclosure of evidence, where the proliferation of electronic records in place of paper documents has created many legal and disciplinary, as well as practical, problems.

Pre-action costs

Lord Justice Jackson has given some space in his preliminary report to exploring how and why pre-action costs are incurred and the devices currently available to parties to keep them in check. There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll