header-logo header-logo

A leap too far?

08 May 2008 / Mark Ashley , Matthew Mcgrath
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Is the bar too low for Human Rights Act cases against NHS trusts? Matthew McGrath and Mark Ashley

Since the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force, public bodies, particularly NHS trusts, have faced possible claims for loss of the right to life where a person in their care has died. The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 1375, [2007] All ER (D) 316 (Dec) provides guidance on how to assess such claims, but in so doing poses more questions than it answers.

Carol Savage had been detained for treatment for paranoid schizophrenia on an open acute psychiatric ward. On 5 July 2005 she absconded and, while out of hospital, committed suicide. A claim was brought by Savage's daughter, in which she alleged that there had been a breach of the deceased's right to life contrary to Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and also a breach of her own right to respect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll