header-logo header-logo

26 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Learning ‘judgecraft’

A coalition of lawyers’ groups has launched an online education programme to encourage a more diverse range of people to apply to the judiciary.

The Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE) programme, which is funded by the government, was launched this week by the Judicial Diversity Forum (composed of the Bar Council, Law Society, Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, Judiciary, Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Appointments Commission).

The programme combines online resources with discussion groups led by judges, giving participants a chance to explore what they perceive to be barriers to their joining the judiciary.

It aims to help lawyers understand the role and skills required of a judge before they apply, and provides advice on how to take the next step. It also covers topics relevant to judges such as judgecraft, ethics and resilience.

Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, said: ‘Promoting diversity and appointing on the basis of merit are mutually reinforcing because the wider the pool the greater the availability of talent, the greater the competition for places and the greater the quality of appointments.’

Robin Allen QC, chair of the Bar Council’s equality and diversity and social mobility committee, said: ‘Working as a judge requires a different perspective from that of a barrister.

‘Of course, like barristers, judges never stop learning about their job, but there is much they can do in preparation for it.’

Priority will be given to ‘those from currently under-represented groups’― women, individuals from BAME backgrounds and those with a disability―according to Lord Kakkar, chairman of the Judicial Appointments Commission and the Judicial Diversity Forum. Lawyers with a non-litigation background (including solicitors and chartered legal executives) will also be encouraged to apply.

More information, including how to apply, is available here.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll