header-logo header-logo

10 March 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property
printer mail-detail

Lease oddities

42008
Mark Pawlowski looks at some unusual aspects of leasehold law
  • Can I grant a lease to myself?
  • Concurrent leases and leases for trees.

Lease of air?

Section 205(1)(ix) of the Law of Property Act 1925 expressly provides that land is capable of both horizontal and vertical division allowing, therefore, for a separation of estates between different strata both above and below the surface layer of the ground. What remains controversial, however, is whether the definition of ‘land’ may include a volume of air space existing as an entirely independent unit of property separate and distinct from any adjacent soil or ground.

There is certainly Commonwealth and US authority which recognises that air space itself is capable of both freehold and leasehold ownership. In Macht v Department of Assessments of Baltimore City (1972) 296 A 2d 162, the Court of Appeals of Maryland accepted that a lease of a volume of air above an altitude of 124 feet over the landlord’s premises (in order to secure access to light and air to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll