header-logo header-logo

10 March 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property
printer mail-detail

Lease oddities

42008
Mark Pawlowski looks at some unusual aspects of leasehold law
  • Can I grant a lease to myself?
  • Concurrent leases and leases for trees.

Lease of air?

Section 205(1)(ix) of the Law of Property Act 1925 expressly provides that land is capable of both horizontal and vertical division allowing, therefore, for a separation of estates between different strata both above and below the surface layer of the ground. What remains controversial, however, is whether the definition of ‘land’ may include a volume of air space existing as an entirely independent unit of property separate and distinct from any adjacent soil or ground.

There is certainly Commonwealth and US authority which recognises that air space itself is capable of both freehold and leasehold ownership. In Macht v Department of Assessments of Baltimore City (1972) 296 A 2d 162, the Court of Appeals of Maryland accepted that a lease of a volume of air above an altitude of 124 feet over the landlord’s premises (in order to secure access to light and air to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll