header-logo header-logo

Lease oddities

10 March 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property
printer mail-detail
42008
Mark Pawlowski looks at some unusual aspects of leasehold law
  • Can I grant a lease to myself?
  • Concurrent leases and leases for trees.

Lease of air?

Section 205(1)(ix) of the Law of Property Act 1925 expressly provides that land is capable of both horizontal and vertical division allowing, therefore, for a separation of estates between different strata both above and below the surface layer of the ground. What remains controversial, however, is whether the definition of ‘land’ may include a volume of air space existing as an entirely independent unit of property separate and distinct from any adjacent soil or ground.

There is certainly Commonwealth and US authority which recognises that air space itself is capable of both freehold and leasehold ownership. In Macht v Department of Assessments of Baltimore City (1972) 296 A 2d 162, the Court of Appeals of Maryland accepted that a lease of a volume of air above an altitude of 124 feet over the landlord’s premises (in order to secure access to light and air to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll