header-logo header-logo

09 August 2018 / Nick Hopkins , Thomas Nicholls
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Leasehold enfranchisement

nlj_7805_hopkins-nicholls

Professor Nick Hopkins & Thomas Nicholls outline the Law Commission’s radical plans for leasehold houses & enfranchisement law

  • An overview of the Law Commission’s Leasehold enfranchisement paper, and the reforms it proposes in order to provide a better deal for leaseholders and simplify the enfranchisement regime.

On 19 July 2018, the Law Commission published the Leasehold enfranchisement: A summary of proposed solutions for leaseholders of houses paper. It outlines provisional solutions for reform of enfranchisement law relating specifically to houses. These suggestions will be fully developed in a full Consultation Paper in September, which will address enfranchisement of both houses and flats.

Leasehold houses are not a new phenomenon, but have become more common in recent years—there are now 1.4m, according to the government. But why are houses sold on a leasehold basis at all?

The justification for selling flats on a leasehold basis is apparent: leasehold facilitates the management of blocks despite positive covenants not running with land.

That is less readily applicable to houses, except to enforce positive covenants on an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll