header-logo header-logo

Leasehold enfranchisement

09 August 2018 / Nick Hopkins , Thomas Nicholls
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail
nlj_7805_hopkins-nicholls

Professor Nick Hopkins & Thomas Nicholls outline the Law Commission’s radical plans for leasehold houses & enfranchisement law

  • An overview of the Law Commission’s Leasehold enfranchisement paper, and the reforms it proposes in order to provide a better deal for leaseholders and simplify the enfranchisement regime.

On 19 July 2018, the Law Commission published the Leasehold enfranchisement: A summary of proposed solutions for leaseholders of houses paper. It outlines provisional solutions for reform of enfranchisement law relating specifically to houses. These suggestions will be fully developed in a full Consultation Paper in September, which will address enfranchisement of both houses and flats.

Leasehold houses are not a new phenomenon, but have become more common in recent years—there are now 1.4m, according to the government. But why are houses sold on a leasehold basis at all?

The justification for selling flats on a leasehold basis is apparent: leasehold facilitates the management of blocks despite positive covenants not running with land.

That is less readily applicable to houses, except to enforce positive covenants on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll