header-logo header-logo

Leeds Utd score in High Court

02 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Football team gain victory over West Yorkshire Police

Leeds United FC won a legal challenge against West Yorkshire Police over the cost of policing matches in the High Court last week.

In Leeds United FC v West Yorkshire Police [2012] EWHC 2113 (QB), Mr Justice Eady, who was shown footage of crowds around Elland Road Stadium, considered to what extent West Yorkshire could recoup policing costs around the “immediate environs of the club premises”. Leeds United currently pays nearly £1m per year towards “special police services”, a fourfold increase from the £250,000 it paid three years ago.

West Yorkshire Police argued it was entitled to levy charges on the club based on a “footprint”, which included policing on the public highway and on publicly accessible land such as car parks and a bus station.

The club did not object to paying for policing within the Elland Road ground or on land owned, leased or controlled by it.

Eady J held that policing on the public highway and on public land fell within “the normal constabulary duty to keep the peace”. Therefore, the costs of such policing were not recoverable from Leeds United.

Sports lawyer Mark Gay, partner at Burges Salmon, who acted for Leeds United, says the judgment also has implications for organisers of rock concerts and demonstrations, who may be asked to pay policing costs. He says: “This is a significant case, which establishes what the police can charge for.”

Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll