header-logo header-logo

02 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Leeds Utd score in High Court

Football team gain victory over West Yorkshire Police

Leeds United FC won a legal challenge against West Yorkshire Police over the cost of policing matches in the High Court last week.

In Leeds United FC v West Yorkshire Police [2012] EWHC 2113 (QB), Mr Justice Eady, who was shown footage of crowds around Elland Road Stadium, considered to what extent West Yorkshire could recoup policing costs around the “immediate environs of the club premises”. Leeds United currently pays nearly £1m per year towards “special police services”, a fourfold increase from the £250,000 it paid three years ago.

West Yorkshire Police argued it was entitled to levy charges on the club based on a “footprint”, which included policing on the public highway and on publicly accessible land such as car parks and a bus station.

The club did not object to paying for policing within the Elland Road ground or on land owned, leased or controlled by it.

Eady J held that policing on the public highway and on public land fell within “the normal constabulary duty to keep the peace”. Therefore, the costs of such policing were not recoverable from Leeds United.

Sports lawyer Mark Gay, partner at Burges Salmon, who acted for Leeds United, says the judgment also has implications for organisers of rock concerts and demonstrations, who may be asked to pay policing costs. He says: “This is a significant case, which establishes what the police can charge for.”

Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll