header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

R (on the application of Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Ltd) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 2498 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 355 (Jul)

The claimant solicitors’ firm issued judicial review proceedings, challenging the defendant lord chancellor’s decision to reduce its claim for costs to nil in a case where work had been carried out for a client financially eligible for legal aid, although at the time the lord chancellor asserted that the firm had not conclusively established that to its satisfaction. The Administrative Court, in allowing the application, held that the lord chancellor’s decision had been based on the answer to the wrong question and would be quashed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll