header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

R (on the application of Duncan Lewis (Solicitors) Ltd) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 2498 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 355 (Jul)

The claimant solicitors’ firm issued judicial review proceedings, challenging the defendant lord chancellor’s decision to reduce its claim for costs to nil in a case where work had been carried out for a client financially eligible for legal aid, although at the time the lord chancellor asserted that the firm had not conclusively established that to its satisfaction. The Administrative Court, in allowing the application, held that the lord chancellor’s decision had been based on the answer to the wrong question and would be quashed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll