header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7670

02 October 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Stephen Acton examines developers’ delays in completion of off-plan purchases

R (on the application of Brooks) v Islington London Borough Council [2015] EWHC 2657 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 103 (Sep)

Miettinen v Sweden T-395/13 , [2015] All ER (D) 115 (Sep)

Horada v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWHC 2512 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 370 (Jul)

Alec Samuels opens the case of the architect’s certificate

Re DGP [2015] EWCOP 58, [2015] All ER (D) 117 (Sep)

Regents University v Regent’s University London [2013] EWPCC 39, [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Sep)

Pre-nups: the search for certainty continues, says Ed Heaton

When is military personnel owed a duty of care outside combat situations? Elizabeth Milbourn investigates

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll