header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

​Best laid plans?

web_acton

Stephen Acton examines developers’ delays in completion of off-plan purchases

Purchasing off-plan in a new development can raise all sorts of problems for the purchaser. Not the least of them concerns the typical lack of certainty as regards the developer’s obligation to complete by any given time, and the consequences of that to the purchaser.

In a one-off development for one specific client, there might well be a contractual completion date, or at least a target date, with contractual penalties for missing that date. Developers do not often, if at all, offer that sort of arrangement in respect of a multiple development, whether commercial or residential. Indeed, in some cases the contract will specify an anticipated legal completion date, but permit the developer to extend that date when delays occur, in particular building delays, for specified reasons.

In other cases, however, the date for completion will be completely open-ended, simply being triggered by the developer’s notice to complete. At most, this might be tied to the completion of the construction, whether issue of a formal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll