header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

​Best laid plans?

web_acton

Stephen Acton examines developers’ delays in completion of off-plan purchases

Purchasing off-plan in a new development can raise all sorts of problems for the purchaser. Not the least of them concerns the typical lack of certainty as regards the developer’s obligation to complete by any given time, and the consequences of that to the purchaser.

In a one-off development for one specific client, there might well be a contractual completion date, or at least a target date, with contractual penalties for missing that date. Developers do not often, if at all, offer that sort of arrangement in respect of a multiple development, whether commercial or residential. Indeed, in some cases the contract will specify an anticipated legal completion date, but permit the developer to extend that date when delays occur, in particular building delays, for specified reasons.

In other cases, however, the date for completion will be completely open-ended, simply being triggered by the developer’s notice to complete. At most, this might be tied to the completion of the construction, whether issue of a formal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll