header-logo header-logo

​Best laid plans?

02 October 2015 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
web_acton

Stephen Acton examines developers’ delays in completion of off-plan purchases

Purchasing off-plan in a new development can raise all sorts of problems for the purchaser. Not the least of them concerns the typical lack of certainty as regards the developer’s obligation to complete by any given time, and the consequences of that to the purchaser.

In a one-off development for one specific client, there might well be a contractual completion date, or at least a target date, with contractual penalties for missing that date. Developers do not often, if at all, offer that sort of arrangement in respect of a multiple development, whether commercial or residential. Indeed, in some cases the contract will specify an anticipated legal completion date, but permit the developer to extend that date when delays occur, in particular building delays, for specified reasons.

In other cases, however, the date for completion will be completely open-ended, simply being triggered by the developer’s notice to complete. At most, this might be tied to the completion of the construction, whether issue of a formal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll