header-logo header-logo

New code issued for driverless cars

02 October 2015
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A new code for driverless cars being tested in public places has been issued.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Lucy McCormick, barrister at Henderson Chambers, says failure to adhere to the new code could be relevant in any subsequent liability proceedings. Three trials of driverless cars, or “autonomous vehicles”, are either currently or soon to be taking place.

Key ingredients of the code include the presence of a “driver”, the existence of a “black box” and effective safeguards against hacking.

McCormick notes that legislative quirks have given the UK a “significant head start in becoming the test bed of an industry that is anticipated to be worth £900bn a year globally by 2025”.

She writes that the government is seeking to build on this by amending domestic regulations by summer 2017 to accommodate further developments in driverless technology

Issue: 7670 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll