header-logo header-logo

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Procedure & practice , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid changes for family cases

The government has extended legal aid in private and public family law cases, and changed the evidential requirements for domestic abuse.

As of 1 March, legal aid is available for both parents and those with parental responsibilities in cases concerning applications for placement and adoption orders and involving local authorities. The rules change brings the merits test in line with cases covered by the Special Children Act 1989.

Also from 1 March, where supporting evidence of domestic abuse is required, legal aid applicants can choose whether to have their assessment carried out by health professionals over the telephone or by video conference instead of in person.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the change took down the ‘additional hurdle’ of face-to-face appointments, but warned the current Domestic Abuse Gateway does not provide for the recognition of emotional, controlling or coercive abuse. She suggested solicitors experienced in domestic abuse cases be authorised to confirm a client is a victim for the purpose of obtaining legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll