header-logo header-logo

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid evidence victory

Five-year time limit abandoned for domestic violence victims

A major evidential obstacle to legal aid for domestic abuse victims has been dropped by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) following a campaign by lawyers and support organisations.

As of this week, there will be no time limit on abuse evidence in private family law disputes-previously, victims had to prove they had suffered, or been at risk of suffering, domestic abuse or child abuse in the previous five years. Opponents said the restrictions prevented about 50% of domestic abuse victims receiving legal aid.

The range of documents accepted as evidence of abuse has also been widened, and will now include statements from domestic violence support organisations and housing support officers.

The Court of Appeal held the evidence requirements set out in LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012), unlawful in February 2016, in R (on the application of) Rights of Women v Lord Chancellor [2016] EWCA Civ 91. The MoJ made the reforms after consulting with charities and legal bodies, including the charity Rights of Women, which brought the legal challenge.

Carol Storer, director of Legal Aid Practitioners Group, said less than half of victims fleeing domestic abuse have been able to access legal aid due to the evidence requirements.

‘The evidence was time limited, failing to recognise that the impact and risk associated with abuse can be lifelong,’ she said.

‘The ability to obtain the necessary evidence is difficult and random and often has a cost involved. Obtaining it is usually inconsistent with the lifestyle of the vast majority of victims fleeing domestic abuse.’ Moreover, obtaining evidence of emotional, psychological, financial abuse or coercive control rather than physical abuse was often difficult.

‘It has taken a long time to bring about these changes, and there are still many hurdles in place.’

Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws said the reform ‘will make it easier for victims to qualify for legal aid and access essential help and support’.

Former justice minister Dominic Raab said: ‘We have listened to victims’ groups and carefully reviewed the criteria for legal aid for victims of domestic abuse in family cases.’

 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll