header-logo header-logo

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid fees rise for police station & youth court

Criminal legal aid solicitors have been offered a pay rise for police station and youth court work

£16m will be used to increase fees for duty solicitor work in police stations, and the fee scheme simplified by raising the lowest charges, according to the eight-week Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation published this week, Crime lower: criminal legal aid.

Currently, fixed fees for police station work vary by geographic area, with 245 different fees across England and Wales. The fees were set in 2008, based on the average cost then of a case in each area.

The consultation proposes two options for harmonising the fee schemes. The first is to increase 174 schemes to £225.63 (excl VAT), with no rise for fee schemes above this amount (all 32 London schemes and 39 non-London schemes are above this amount). The second, and the MoJ’s preferred option, is to increase 173 non-London schemes to £223.52 (excl VAT) and 26 London schemes to £264,45 (excl VAT).

Youth court fees for the most serious offences will be raised by £548 per case, accounting for £5.1m of additional funds.

The funding comes from £21.1m per year allocated to longer-term reforms from the financial year 2024-2025, as part of the MoJ’s response to the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review (CLAIR). The CLAIR, which reported in 2021, found the police station and youth court fee schemes outdated and not reflective of the complexity of work involved. This week’s consultation addresses how the £21.1m is distributed.

The fee rises apply to new work from summer 2024.

Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk said duty solicitors ‘play a critical role in ensuring access to justice by giving people legal advice, often at antisocial hours and at a moment’s notice’£548 (not inc. VAT) fee increase in the Youth Court.

However, Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the extra money was ‘a small step in the right direction’ but ‘still leaves the increased expenditure below that identified by Lord Bellamy as “the minimum necessary”… Moreover, the impact of these increases, including those announced [this week] has been wiped out by inflation’.

The consultation ends on 28 March.

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll