header-logo header-logo

06 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Cybercrime , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Legal aid firms left in limbo for a year

The Law Society has renewed its calls for compensation for legal aid firms affected by the cyber-attack on the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)

The LAA took down its IT systems last May after discovering the attack—initially thought to be less severe than it was—in April, leaving lawyers unable to bill for work online for several months. Criminal practitioners had to wait until September, and civil lawyers until the middle of December, for the system to get up and running again.

‘It’s disgraceful that a year on from the data breach that left legal aid firms out of pocket, they still haven’t been compensated by the LAA,’ said Law Society president Mark Evans.

‘They operate on the margins on economic viability and were put to substantial expense, stress and significant additional bureaucracy, through no fault of their own, when the LAA systems were attacked. No small business should be required to bear the burden of such major additional cost caused by the failings of a government department.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll