header-logo header-logo

31 March 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal aid practitioners' fears for compulsory IT system

From 1 April, all new civil legal aid applications must be made through the Client and Cost Management System (CCMS), the Legal Aid Agency has said.

The CCMS has proved controversial due to repeated complaints from practitioners experiencing technical difficulties with the system. Last week, family lawyers’ group Resolution wrote to the Agency asking them to delay compulsory use of the system as it was “not fit for purpose”. Resolution and the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) released a joint statement this week expressing disappointment at the Agency’s decision to press ahead. They said more than two-thirds of users “reported regularly experiencing problems with CCMS in a recent survey”.

Emma Cordock, chair of Resolution’s legal aid committee, and LAPG co-chairs Nicola Mackintosh and Jenny Beck say they welcome the Agency’s contingency measures allowing for paper submissions in “exceptional circumstances”. However, they warn that the guidance on these contingency measures is confusing and uncertain, and that it is not exceptional for users to be unable to access the Agency portal.

“We recognise that the [Agency] is keen to avoid another government IT failure,” they said.

“Unfortunately, if they plough ahead with CCMS—which 82% of users say is not ready for compulsory use—that is exactly what they will have.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We are very mindful of the recent LAA Online Portal issues, which resulted in some providers having difficulty accessing CCMS.

“The issues have been fixed and providers have seen improved performance as a result. Our primary objective is to ensure that access to legal aid is available and that applications are not hindered. If providers experience significant technical difficulties after 1 April they will still be able to submit paper applications.”

Twitter users have highlighted the issues with the CCMS system using the #CCMSfail hashtag.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll