header-logo header-logo

Legal aid safety net is “lawful”

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The exceptional case funding scheme, which helps those who fail to secure legal aid for civil matters, is lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Lord Justice Laws overturned an earlier ruling by Mr Justice Collins that the scheme was complex, rigid and unlawful as it gave rise “to an unacceptable risk that an individual will not be able to obtain legal aid where failure to provide it would be a breach of that individual’s rights”.

The scheme was intended to be a safety net for claimants who fell through the gaps after the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force. However, there has been a low take-up so far. The Ministry of Justice expected about 6,000 applications to be made each year but last year only 1,172 applications were made and 226 granted.

In The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464, Laws LJ acknowledged there had been “troubling” difficulties with the scheme but said: “The learning curve will continue.”

He added: “No doubt the Legal Aid Agency and the Lord Chancellor will be astute to look for improvements, and will do so on a continuing basis.”

Dissenting, Lord Justice Briggs said: “In my judgment the defects in the procedures for applying for [the scheme] in the system in place at the time of the hearing before Collins J were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair, so that I would have been disposed to dismiss this appeal.”

 
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll