header-logo header-logo

Legal aid safety net is “lawful”

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The exceptional case funding scheme, which helps those who fail to secure legal aid for civil matters, is lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Lord Justice Laws overturned an earlier ruling by Mr Justice Collins that the scheme was complex, rigid and unlawful as it gave rise “to an unacceptable risk that an individual will not be able to obtain legal aid where failure to provide it would be a breach of that individual’s rights”.

The scheme was intended to be a safety net for claimants who fell through the gaps after the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force. However, there has been a low take-up so far. The Ministry of Justice expected about 6,000 applications to be made each year but last year only 1,172 applications were made and 226 granted.

In The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464, Laws LJ acknowledged there had been “troubling” difficulties with the scheme but said: “The learning curve will continue.”

He added: “No doubt the Legal Aid Agency and the Lord Chancellor will be astute to look for improvements, and will do so on a continuing basis.”

Dissenting, Lord Justice Briggs said: “In my judgment the defects in the procedures for applying for [the scheme] in the system in place at the time of the hearing before Collins J were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair, so that I would have been disposed to dismiss this appeal.”

 
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll