header-logo header-logo

The legal dig

16 March 2007 / James Pirrie
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

How should the courts assess equality in division of assets during divorce proceedings, asks James Pirrie

There is something in the work of archaeologists that reflects the current difficulties faced by family lawyers. An excavation requires a large group of people to pick through the rubble to find a few nuggets, which are delivered to a learned few, who develop a theory to unlock the mysteries of the investigation. The experience of family lawyers has been similar. We don’t understand the detail of the family law site, but we have a map called s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973)—it just doesn’t give enough detail to be useful.

Uncovering the evidence

At enormous cost to a few unfortunate families—who could not find good enough answers from the law, their advisers or their negotiations—the industry has assembled a range of cases that give us glimpses of an underlying pattern that should exist but that still remains hard to discern. There are some parts that seem clear but others are mired in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll