header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Employment
printer mail-detail

Legal implications for Shilpa and Jade

News

Bullied Celebrity Big Brother (BB) contestant Shilpa Shetty could have a claim in law against production company Endemol UK, says a prominent media lawyer.

Shetty, a Bollywood actress, has been unknowingly caught in the eye of a political storm following public outrage over her ill treatment at the hands of co-contestant Jade Goody.

 Media lawyer Mark Stephens, a partner at Finers Stephens Innocent LLP, says: “Having represented many BB contestants in the past, my focus is the fact that because they are paid to appear, they are workers so benefit from all the protections an employee has in the workplace.”

He says that if a secretary walked into Channel 4’s offices and faced bullying and harassment then they would have a cast-iron claim, and there is no reason to distinguish between that and what Shetty was subjected to.
“I think she would have a good claim against Endemol [the makers of BB],” he adds. “Under broadcasting legislation there may be a breach of Channel 4’s obligation to provide appropriate viewing.

“The whole BB process is about disempowerment. I have represented 16 or 17 contestants and everyone talks about their sense of isolation, the key thing is if you’re in an environment you don’t like at any other point in your life you can go home, shut the door and share the burden with your friends and intimates. In BB you’re in a situation where you’re with people you’ve never met before, you can’t escape, and must befriend and then betray them by nominating, and that is counter-cultural to any normal behaviour.”

However, legal commentator B Mahendra says: “I don’t think there are any legal implications at all. It’s not racial discrimination as such, just shouting insults. I don’t think there could be a prosecution, it’s not primarily racist abuse and for a prosecution to proceed there has to be a 50% chance of conviction and it needs to be in the public interest to pursue the case.”

The Commission for Racial Equality has expressed concern over the programme, and is writing to Channel 4 “to remind them of their legal responsibilities as a public broadcaster, under the terms of the Race Relations Amendment Act, to eliminate racial discrimination, promote racial equality and to promote good relations between people from different racial groups”.

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll