header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009
Categories: Legislation , EU
printer mail-detail

Legislation round-up

This update is provided by Current Awareness and News

12 Dec 2008; 1 Jan 2009; and 6 April 2009

High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008/2934)

Amends the High Court and County Courts Jurisdiction Order 1991 (SI 1991/724) to give the county court jurisdiction in relation to Council Reg 1896/2006/EC of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure.

Also gives the county court jurisdiction in relation to Council Reg 61/2007/EC of 11 July 2007 establishing a European small claims procedure so that applications under Art 4 of the ESCP Regulation must be commenced in a county court.

If the claim is worth £15,000 or less it will have to be commenced in a county court but if worth more than £15,000 it can be commenced in either the High Court or a county court. This requirement is necessary in order to allow litigants to be able to apply for the issue of a European order for payment on precisely the same jurisdictional basis that they can currently issue claims for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll