header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Henrietta Hill
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Lessons learned

How will the judgment in G affect employees outside the schoolroom? Henrietta Hill reports

In R (on the application of G) v (1) Governors of X School (2) Y City Council (Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and the Equality and Human Rights intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1, [2010] All ER (D) 118 (Jan) the claimant was a part-time teaching assistant. It was alleged that he had kissed a 15-year-old boy who was undertaking work experience at the defendant’s school and had sought to groom him with a view to conducting a sexual relationship with him.

During the internal proceedings before the disciplinary committee of the school’s governors, the claimant asked to be permitted legal representation at the hearing. The request was refused and he was told that he was only entitled to be accompanied by a work colleague or union representative. The disciplinary committee found the allegations established and dismissed the claimant. The claimant appealed to the appeal committee of the school’s governors, again requesting permission to be legally represented and again he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll