header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Henrietta Hill
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Lessons learned

How will the judgment in G affect employees outside the schoolroom? Henrietta Hill reports

In R (on the application of G) v (1) Governors of X School (2) Y City Council (Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and the Equality and Human Rights intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1, [2010] All ER (D) 118 (Jan) the claimant was a part-time teaching assistant. It was alleged that he had kissed a 15-year-old boy who was undertaking work experience at the defendant’s school and had sought to groom him with a view to conducting a sexual relationship with him.

During the internal proceedings before the disciplinary committee of the school’s governors, the claimant asked to be permitted legal representation at the hearing. The request was refused and he was told that he was only entitled to be accompanied by a work colleague or union representative. The disciplinary committee found the allegations established and dismissed the claimant. The claimant appealed to the appeal committee of the school’s governors, again requesting permission to be legally represented and again he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll