header-logo header-logo

10 October 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lethal weapon: knife crime & the law

He is charged with carrying a knife: Alec Samuels examines the related possibilities & outcomes
  • Are there any defences or mitigating circumstances that are available to someone that has been charged with carrying a knife?
  • The law is scattered over several different statutes and unconsolidated. When will we get a reformed modern code of criminal law, evidence and procedure, and sentencing?

If charged with carrying a knife or having a bladed article under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, s 1; the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959; the Criminal Justice Act 1988, s 139; the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 SI 2019; and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019…is there any defence or mitigation?

The knife must be proved by the prosecution to be an offensive weapon, either per se or otherwise. The weapon is likely to be per se offensive if in reality there is no proper use likely or possible, eg the only use of a flick knife (defined in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll