header-logo header-logo

Lethal weapon: knife crime & the law

10 October 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
He is charged with carrying a knife: Alec Samuels examines the related possibilities & outcomes
  • Are there any defences or mitigating circumstances that are available to someone that has been charged with carrying a knife?
  • The law is scattered over several different statutes and unconsolidated. When will we get a reformed modern code of criminal law, evidence and procedure, and sentencing?

If charged with carrying a knife or having a bladed article under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, s 1; the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959; the Criminal Justice Act 1988, s 139; the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 SI 2019; and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019…is there any defence or mitigation?

The knife must be proved by the prosecution to be an offensive weapon, either per se or otherwise. The weapon is likely to be per se offensive if in reality there is no proper use likely or possible, eg the only use of a flick knife (defined in 2019

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll