header-logo header-logo

Lethal weapon: knife crime & the law

10 October 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
He is charged with carrying a knife: Alec Samuels examines the related possibilities & outcomes
  • Are there any defences or mitigating circumstances that are available to someone that has been charged with carrying a knife?
  • The law is scattered over several different statutes and unconsolidated. When will we get a reformed modern code of criminal law, evidence and procedure, and sentencing?

If charged with carrying a knife or having a bladed article under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, s 1; the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959; the Criminal Justice Act 1988, s 139; the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 SI 2019; and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019…is there any defence or mitigation?

The knife must be proved by the prosecution to be an offensive weapon, either per se or otherwise. The weapon is likely to be per se offensive if in reality there is no proper use likely or possible, eg the only use of a flick knife (defined in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll