header-logo header-logo

04 October 2013 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Level crossing?

istock_000013052111medium

Keith Patten investigates the complex area of law surrounding statutory employment & common law negligence

The vexed issue of the boundary between statutory employment protection law and employment related personal injury law tends to come into focus most clearly in circumstances where the claimant alleges that they have suffered some form of psychological injury as a result of the conduct of the employers at or around the time of the termination of employment. The question will then arise as to whether these two areas of law operate entirely independently of each other so that the claimant can pursue a remedy under either or both, or whether the circumstances will limit the claimant to one or other of those causes of action.

The fact that this boundary line remains an issue is illustrated by the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Monk v Cann Hall Primary School [2013] EWCA Civ 826, [2013] All ER (D) 129 (Jul).

Re-organisation

The claimant was employed by the defendant as an administrative assistant. Following a staffing re-organisation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll