header-logo header-logo

24 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Libel law shake up

News In Brief

A long-standing rule of libel law that each publication can form the basis of a new cause of action could be scrapped to bring the law up to date with the age of the internet. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has proposed abandoning the multiple publication rule in favour of a single publication rule, which would allow only one libel action to be brought in England and Wales against particular defamatory material. Currently, material is deemed to have been published every time an online article is downloaded reader clicks on a webpage. The MoJ consultation paper, Defamation and the Internet, published last week, asks whether the current limitation period of one year from the “date of publication” should be extended to three years from the “date of publication” or to one year from the “date of knowledge”.

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll