header-logo header-logo

Libya—Recognition of legitimate government—Permission to deal with state bank accounts

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

British Arab Commercial Bank plc v The National Transitional Council of the State of Libya [2011] EWHC 2274

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Blair J, 26 Aug 2011

A bank was granted a declaration that it was entitled to act on instructions from the National Transitional Council of the State of Libya and not the former Qadhafi regime.

Andrew Fletcher QC (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the bank. Richard Perkoff (instructed by Clyde & Co LLP) for NTC. David Perry QC and Christopher Staker (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

The proceedings concerned the control of accounts of the Libyan Embassy in London held with the claimant bank. On 27 July 2011 the defendant (NTC) was recognised by Her Majesty’s Government as the “sole governmental authority in Libya”. Prior to that date the recognised government of Libya was that of Muammar Muhammad al-Qadhafi. The embassy was a long standing client of the bank.

From the money in the accounts the embassy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll