header-logo header-logo

10 April 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Licensing Act 2003 (Permitted Temporary Activities) (Notices) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/960)

Amend the Licensing Act 2003 (Permitted Temporary Activities) (Notices) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2918)...

Commencement date

25 April 2012


Summary

Amend the Licensing Act 2003 (Permitted Temporary Activities) (Notices) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2918) to give effect to certain amendments made to the Licensing Act 2003 by the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011.

The amendments enable the police and local authority exercising environmental health functions to object to a temporary event notice (TEN) on the basis of any licensing objectives; the premises user to give a limited number of TENs no later than five working days before the event; the licensing authority to impose conditions on a TEN if the requirements set out in section 106A of the 2003 Act are met; and a TEN to authorise an activity to be carried on for a maximum period of 168 hours (7 days).

Also prescribe the form of the counter notice which the licensing authority may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll