header-logo header-logo

03 December 2020 / David Burrows
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Lies of the land: the judge, the actress & her cash

33618
David Burrows tells the tale of Singer J & a hardship defence

My own ‘lies of the land’ story goes back to 1997–2002 in the Family Division (see Dominic Regan’s ‘Lie(s) of the land’, NLJ 6 November 2020, p22). No reported decision emerged from the case. The proceedings involved two phases. For phase one, the cast was Mr Justice Singer, my client JS, by then retired from flying for British Airways (BA) but still flying commercially, his still-dependant wife PS, Lucy Theis (a barrister, now Mrs Justice Theis) and PS’s witness G.

Phase two saw Valentine Le Grice QC replace Theis, PS’s mother, who retained Richard Todd (now QC), and Mr Justice Bennett, as well as JS, PS and G. Of the lawyers, only I stayed the two phases. Singer J and Val died within days of one another in December 2018.

The case turned on the fact that, when JS could finally file a five-year petition (living apart for five years),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll