header-logo header-logo

27 September 2007 / Eloise Power
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Features , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life after Huang

Could exceptionality return through the back door?
Eloise Power reports

The appellant in AG (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 801, [2007] All ER (D) 490 (Jul) was a victim of torture of mixed Ethiopian and Eritrean parentage who was born and brought up in Ethiopia and had never lived in Eritrea. He had arrived in the UK and applied for asylum in August 1999, when he was aged 14. In subsequent years he built up private life ties in the UK. His ties included his education and the receipt of psychological support. The Home Office refused his asylum application four years later and set removal directions for Eritrea rather than Ethiopia.

His appeal to an adjudicator was allowed on asylum and on human rights grounds, including Art 8 (right to family and private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). This decision was overturned on reconsideration, save for the favourable findings about credibility. Permission to appeal was granted by Lord Justice Carnwath.
In a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll