header-logo header-logo

A life and death decision

29 May 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns discusses the separation of powers' doctrine between the judiciary and the executive in the UK

The House of Lords' (HL) decision in R (on the application of Gentle and another) v Prime Minister and others [2008] All ER (D) 111 (Apr), [2008] UKHL 20, that the British government did not owe a duty to British troops and their families under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) to hold a public inquiry into whether it had obtained adequate prior legal advice on the legality in international law of the Iraq invasion, signals the reluctance of courts to subject the executive's decisions on matters of high public policy to forensic scrutiny and accountability, allied to the need to limit the potential scope and applicability of a key Convention Article.

Background

The appellants, Rose Gentle and Beverley Clarke, were the mothers of two British soldiers, both 19, who were killed serving in Iraq. Fusilier Gentle of the 1st Battalion The Royal Highland Fusiliers was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll