header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A life and death decision

Seamus Burns discusses the separation of powers' doctrine between the judiciary and the executive in the UK

The House of Lords' (HL) decision in R (on the application of Gentle and another) v Prime Minister and others [2008] All ER (D) 111 (Apr), [2008] UKHL 20, that the British government did not owe a duty to British troops and their families under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) to hold a public inquiry into whether it had obtained adequate prior legal advice on the legality in international law of the Iraq invasion, signals the reluctance of courts to subject the executive's decisions on matters of high public policy to forensic scrutiny and accountability, allied to the need to limit the potential scope and applicability of a key Convention Article.

Background

The appellants, Rose Gentle and Beverley Clarke, were the mothers of two British soldiers, both 19, who were killed serving in Iraq. Fusilier Gentle of the 1st Battalion The Royal Highland Fusiliers was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll