header-logo header-logo

A life and death decision

29 May 2008 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns discusses the separation of powers' doctrine between the judiciary and the executive in the UK

The House of Lords' (HL) decision in R (on the application of Gentle and another) v Prime Minister and others [2008] All ER (D) 111 (Apr), [2008] UKHL 20, that the British government did not owe a duty to British troops and their families under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) to hold a public inquiry into whether it had obtained adequate prior legal advice on the legality in international law of the Iraq invasion, signals the reluctance of courts to subject the executive's decisions on matters of high public policy to forensic scrutiny and accountability, allied to the need to limit the potential scope and applicability of a key Convention Article.

Background

The appellants, Rose Gentle and Beverley Clarke, were the mothers of two British soldiers, both 19, who were killed serving in Iraq. Fusilier Gentle of the 1st Battalion The Royal Highland Fusiliers was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll