header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Tracey Angus , Katherine Mcquail , Beverly-ann Rogers
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Life and reconciliation after death

Mediation can help solve the tangles left behind after a death, say Beverly-Ann Rogers, Katherine McQuail and Tracey Angus

Many Chancery disputes involve a fight between the current partner of the deceased at the time of his or her death and the children of a former relationship as to how the estate should be split between them. Indeed, the reading of a will is a well-known catalyst for family schisms and even, it is said, psychological disorders.

The dispute typically rests on the perceived unsatisfactory consequences of intestacy or testamentary provisions, an ambiguity or error in the drafting of the deceased's will or the rights of family members to make a claim for a share or increased share of the estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975).

Ultimately such disputes are about the way in which money and assets should be shared out. However, the family history which attaches to the acquisition of the money—it was inherited from the children's other parent—and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll