header-logo header-logo

Life in the fast lane

11 June 2009 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Can Lord Justice Jackson fix fast track costs? asks Andrew Parker

There are many issues tackled in Lord Justice Jackson’s Preliminary Report on Civil Costs, but one target area in particular is crying out for reform: fixed costs in fast track cases. As he records in Chapter 22, this was one of Lord Woolf’s original proposals in his Final Report in 2006, appropriately entitled Access to Justice.

Sir Rupert goes on to say that, although limited elements of fast track costs have been fixed (see CPR Pts 45 and 46), he and his panel of assessors unanimously agree “that we should take forward this work and try to achieve a fixed costs system in fast track cases”.

He then sets out the work of his sub-committee in creating an up to date matrix for all fast track cases.

It is worth noting that the debate has moved on from whether we should have fixed costs in all stages of fast track

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll