header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7373

11 June 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

M (a minor by his litigation friend LT) v Ministry of Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 419, [2009] All ER (D) 44 (Jun)

Napier and another v Pressdram Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 443, [2009] All ER (D) 31 (Jun)

Roger Smith stands up for transparency

Jane Mayfield reviews the FSA’s tougher stance

Personal injury

Ian Barratt explains why employee wellbeing is rising up the work agenda

Kenneth Warner weighs up evidence for causal links in cases of injury

When is media attendance in court intrusive? asks Rebecca Newitt

When is it reasonable to make a possession order? asks James Driscoll

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll