header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Crypto , Fraud , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?

242977
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’

While the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025 and R v Lakeman signal judicial willingness to recognise digital value, contractual terms often deny users true ownership. Conversion and tracing claims face obstacles where assets exist only under revocable licences.

Practitioners must focus on early disclosure, Norwich Pharmacal relief and following real-world cash-outs. The law ‘does not disregard economic value merely because it is digital’, but remedies require tactical precision.

Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Crypto , Fraud , Cybercrime
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll