header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Paul Schwartfeger , Nadia Latti
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Crypto , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Stealing virtual gold

242977

Game on for fraudsters? Paul Schwartfeger & Nadia Latti consider civil fraud in platform-controlled digital assets

  • Platform-controlled digital assets can generate real value, real fraud and real losses—yet they often sit beyond the reach of orthodox proprietary remedies, even as the courts begin to recognise their functional reality.
  • This article considers the legislation, case law and scope for remedies.

If someone gains access to your gaming account and steals a unique, legendary item, you have plainly lost something of value. That item might have taken you hundreds of hours to acquire. It may have cost real money upfront or formed part of a limited release whose value later spiked. It might be irreplaceable or, in exceptional cases, saleable for a substantial sum on the platform or a third-party marketplace, as the sale of a Counter-Strike 2 virtual weapon for more than $1m shows. Yet, if the matter reaches court, an awkward question may arise: have you lost any ‘property’ of value at all?

Modern online games

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll