header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health , Court of Protection , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Don’t let your LPA gather dust

242969
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes

Alzheimer’s affects ‘one in fourteen people over the age of 65’, making timely planning essential.

Clients should not assume ‘that their attorneys know how to manage another person’s finances’, and clear restrictions—particularly on gifts—can avert costly Court of Protection disputes.

Letters of wishes, though not binding, carry real weight in evidencing a donor’s values and best interests. Without an up-to-date LPA, families risk court intervention or even a local authority deputy.

Proactive conversations now can prevent litigation later, Stanyer writes.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll