header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

James Driscoll

Solicitor & consultant editor

Professor James Driscoll is a solicitor and the consultant editor to Halsbury’s Laws

Solicitor & consultant editor

Professor James Driscoll is a solicitor and the consultant editor to Halsbury’s Laws

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

James Driscoll summarises the key developments in the law relating to residential long leases in the past year

How should rent repayment sanctions be applied where a landlord runs unlicensed houses in multiple occupation? James Driscoll reports

James Driscoll follows the battle to make service charges more accountable

James Driscoll unravels the principles & practicalities of the Localism Act 2011

Hague on Leasehold Enfranchisement, Anthony Radevsky & Damian Greenish

When is it reasonable to make a possession order? asks James Driscoll

James Driscoll explores when it's reasonable to call a building a house

Why has commonhold been so slow to catch on? James Driscoll investigates

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll