header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

New lease of life

web_driscoll

James Driscoll summarises the key developments in the law relating to residential long leases in the past year

For the two million or so households who own leasehold flats, disputes over service charges and other criticisms of the general quality of management of a block of flats are all too common. These days, almost all such disputes are resolved in what is commonly known as the leasehold valuation tribunal. A key development this year was the merger of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT), the rent assessment committee, the residential property tribunal, the Adjudicator for the Land Registry and the Agricultural Tribunal into a new First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) with new procedural rules, the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (with appeals to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)).

 

Service charges

As always, there have been several decisions of the courts and the tribunal to consider. The most significant decision this year was that of the Supreme Court in Daejan Investments v Benson [2013] UKSC 14, [2013] 2 All ER 375. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll