header-logo header-logo

Payback time

15 March 2013 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail
istock_000023431202medium_1

How should rent repayment sanctions be applied where a landlord runs unlicensed houses in multiple occupation? James Driscoll reports

Many families and individuals live in buildings where they share amenities such as kitchens, bathrooms and toilets. Hostels and bed and breakfast accommodation are two common examples. In other cases, private landlords let rooms where the occupiers share some of the facilities. Groups of students and others may share a house. Dwellings which are multi-occupied in this way are known as houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) (although a sharing of amenities is not always necessary for a dwelling to be treated as an HMO). Certain converted blocks of flats are also treated as HMOs.

Housing Act 2004

As a form of housing provision, HMOs suffer from some of the worst housing conditions. Facilities are often poor and below statutory standards and, in some cases, the fire escape arrangements are unsatisfactory, or unsafe. It was to give local housing authorities more effective powers to deal with HMOs that Pt 2 of the Housing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll