header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nothing going on but the rent

When is it reasonable to make a possession order? asks James Driscoll

In order to recover possession against a tenant with security of tenure, it is a fundamental principle that the ground for possession must be proved and also, crucially, that it is reasonable to make an order. This was established by the Rent Acts and continued by later housing legislation.

Under the Rent Act 1977 (RA 1977), a landlord can only recover possession against a tenant if the tenant is provided with suitable alternative accommodation, or if one of what are sometimes described as the discretionary grounds for possession set out in RA 1977, Sch 15, such as rent arrears, is proved.

In either case it must be reasonable to make an order for possession. There are also a number of mandatory grounds where possession must be ordered if the relevant ground is made out (Sch 15, Pt 2).

Similarly, under the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) a court can only order possession against a secure tenant where a specific

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll