header-logo header-logo

Whatever happened to commonhold?

07 August 2008 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Why has commonhold been so slow to catch on? James Driscoll investigates

It will soon be four years since commonhold became available for new property developments—commercial, residential or mixed use. Commonhold can also be used for a leasehold or a freehold conversion, provided that all the owners and others with interest in the premises unanimously agree. However, flat developments continue to be marketed and sold and managed on the traditional freehold/leasehold basis with all the potential legal and administrative difficulties that this can entail.

This system should be contrasted with commonhold which, since 27 September 2004, has been available for new development and for conversions. It confers freehold ownership for units within a commonhold coupled with membership of a commonhold association which owns and manages the common parts. A particularly attractive feature of commonhold, apart from conferring freehold ownership, is the fact that the documentation for a commonhold has been prescribed by a statutory instrument with allowance being made to include local rules suitable for the particular development. For example, each commonhold development must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll