header-logo header-logo

Whatever happened to commonhold?

07 August 2008 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Why has commonhold been so slow to catch on? James Driscoll investigates

It will soon be four years since commonhold became available for new property developments—commercial, residential or mixed use. Commonhold can also be used for a leasehold or a freehold conversion, provided that all the owners and others with interest in the premises unanimously agree. However, flat developments continue to be marketed and sold and managed on the traditional freehold/leasehold basis with all the potential legal and administrative difficulties that this can entail.

This system should be contrasted with commonhold which, since 27 September 2004, has been available for new development and for conversions. It confers freehold ownership for units within a commonhold coupled with membership of a commonhold association which owns and manages the common parts. A particularly attractive feature of commonhold, apart from conferring freehold ownership, is the fact that the documentation for a commonhold has been prescribed by a statutory instrument with allowance being made to include local rules suitable for the particular development. For example, each commonhold development must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll