header-logo header-logo

29 March 2012 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Highly charged

istock_000013000299medium_4

James Driscoll follows the battle to make service charges more accountable

Service charges are a constant source of friction between leaseholders and landlords. There is some evidence that not only are these costs increasing, but that more and more leaseholders are questioning the charges and challenging them. A new contribution to the general debate over charges has just been published by the Greater London Authority (GLA). In their report Highly Charged: Residential leasehold service charges in London (GLA, March 2012) the impact of service charges is considered along with a number of recommendations to create what it calls a “re-balance” of the leaseholder/freeholder relationship (see www.london.gov.uk/publication/service-charges-london). 


Flat ownership is widespread and many new housing developments are, or include, blocks of flats sold on long leases. In other cases, former tenants of social landlords own flats having exercised the right to buy. Typically, the owner of the freehold is responsible for the insurance, the repair and maintenance of the building and the upkeep of the common parts. Between them, the leaseholders contribute to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll