header-logo header-logo

Highly charged

29 March 2012 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail
istock_000013000299medium_4

James Driscoll follows the battle to make service charges more accountable

Service charges are a constant source of friction between leaseholders and landlords. There is some evidence that not only are these costs increasing, but that more and more leaseholders are questioning the charges and challenging them. A new contribution to the general debate over charges has just been published by the Greater London Authority (GLA). In their report Highly Charged: Residential leasehold service charges in London (GLA, March 2012) the impact of service charges is considered along with a number of recommendations to create what it calls a “re-balance” of the leaseholder/freeholder relationship (see www.london.gov.uk/publication/service-charges-london). 


Flat ownership is widespread and many new housing developments are, or include, blocks of flats sold on long leases. In other cases, former tenants of social landlords own flats having exercised the right to buy. Typically, the owner of the freehold is responsible for the insurance, the repair and maintenance of the building and the upkeep of the common parts. Between them, the leaseholders contribute to the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll