header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7507

29 March 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

The government has failed in its attempt to promote fairer, quicker & cheaper justice, says Toby Craig

Will the proposed changes to financial regulation work, ask Lista M Cannon & Paul Adams

Geraldine Morris examines where the fault lies for wasted costs

Gill Edwards considers why Rabone is a landmark human rights decision

James Driscoll follows the battle to make service charges more accountable

The Bar should be proud of its contribution to the impartial administration of justice, says Stephen Hockman QC

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Master Whitaker suggests a framework for improving the practice & reducing the costs of e-discovery

In the second of three articles Margaret Tofalides & Clare Arthurs discuss s 68 arbitration challenges

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll