header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7507

29 March 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

The government has failed in its attempt to promote fairer, quicker & cheaper justice, says Toby Craig

Will the proposed changes to financial regulation work, ask Lista M Cannon & Paul Adams

Geraldine Morris examines where the fault lies for wasted costs

Gill Edwards considers why Rabone is a landmark human rights decision

James Driscoll follows the battle to make service charges more accountable

The Bar should be proud of its contribution to the impartial administration of justice, says Stephen Hockman QC

Tom Morrison returns with his quarterly review of the world of information law

Master Whitaker suggests a framework for improving the practice & reducing the costs of e-discovery

In the second of three articles Margaret Tofalides & Clare Arthurs discuss s 68 arbitration challenges

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll