header-logo header-logo

29 March 2012 / Stephen Hockman KC
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

The Bar should be proud of its contribution to the impartial administration of justice, says Stephen Hockman QC

As everyone knows, we have for many years had a divided legal profession in this country. The division was essentially based upon differing methods of qualification and differing, albeit overlapping, functions. The method of qualification for the Bar is to be called to the Bar by an Inn of Court. This historic arrangement had been recognised in the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, though the right of the Inns to call people to the Bar has never depended on statute. As to function, the Bar’s code of conduct has for many years delimited the functions of barrister in various ways. In practice, the Bar has specialised in advocacy and advisory work in connection with contentious matters.

The Clementi review accepted that it would be inappropriate to insist upon a single monolithic, heavy-handed regulatory system for the legal profession as a whole. Clementi accepted, and the Legal Services Act 2007 therefore embraces, the pre-existing system under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll