header-logo header-logo

A fine distinction

29 March 2012 / Stephen Hockman KC
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The Bar should be proud of its contribution to the impartial administration of justice, says Stephen Hockman QC

As everyone knows, we have for many years had a divided legal profession in this country. The division was essentially based upon differing methods of qualification and differing, albeit overlapping, functions. The method of qualification for the Bar is to be called to the Bar by an Inn of Court. This historic arrangement had been recognised in the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, though the right of the Inns to call people to the Bar has never depended on statute. As to function, the Bar’s code of conduct has for many years delimited the functions of barrister in various ways. In practice, the Bar has specialised in advocacy and advisory work in connection with contentious matters.

The Clementi review accepted that it would be inappropriate to insist upon a single monolithic, heavy-handed regulatory system for the legal profession as a whole. Clementi accepted, and the Legal Services Act 2007 therefore embraces, the pre-existing system under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll