header-logo header-logo

A fine distinction

29 March 2012 / Stephen Hockman KC
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

The Bar should be proud of its contribution to the impartial administration of justice, says Stephen Hockman QC

As everyone knows, we have for many years had a divided legal profession in this country. The division was essentially based upon differing methods of qualification and differing, albeit overlapping, functions. The method of qualification for the Bar is to be called to the Bar by an Inn of Court. This historic arrangement had been recognised in the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, though the right of the Inns to call people to the Bar has never depended on statute. As to function, the Bar’s code of conduct has for many years delimited the functions of barrister in various ways. In practice, the Bar has specialised in advocacy and advisory work in connection with contentious matters.

The Clementi review accepted that it would be inappropriate to insist upon a single monolithic, heavy-handed regulatory system for the legal profession as a whole. Clementi accepted, and the Legal Services Act 2007 therefore embraces, the pre-existing system under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll