header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025
Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Government U-turns on plans for day one rights

Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said

The government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill initially contained provisions to give employees statutory rights regarding unfair dismissal from their first day at work. However, Department for Business and Trade ministers confirmed this week the Bill will be watered down to ensure it makes it through Parliament in time for its scheduled April 2026 implementation.

Employees will now be able to bring a claim for unfair dismissal after six months, under the bill—still a major reduction from the current qualifying period of 24 months.

Jo Mackie, employment partner, Michelmores, said: ‘This is no surprise.

‘It was unwieldy and unworkable and we predicted this would happen as soon as it was launched. Probation periods are important for both employees and employers and the tribunals would really have struggled to keep up with the raft of new claims that would have arisen.’

Rena Magdani, partner, Freeths, said the change ‘offers clarity to employers and employees and avoids what would likely have been complexity and uncertainty generated by the government’s proposed “light-touch procedure” during an “initial period of employment”’.

Ministers also confirmed this week the unfair dismissal compensation cap will be lifted.

Magdani said: ‘The current compensation cap is the lower of one year’s pay or £118,223. 

‘While the average unfair dismissal award is significantly lower than this cap, if the cap is significantly increased or removed, then the level of exposure to employers in unfair dismissal claims will increase, particularly in cases of high-earners, or those whose dismissal results in them leaving defined benefit pension schemes, or employees who struggle to find alternative employment.’

The bill will retain its provisions for day one rights to sick pay and paternity leave in April 2026 as well as launching the Fair Work Agency.

Welcoming the U-turn on day one unfair dismissal protection, James Townsend, partner, Payne Hicks Beach, said there was ‘still time for ministers to rethink and scale back other measures, particularly those that will significantly expand union power’.

Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll