header-logo header-logo

29 March 2012 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs
printer mail-detail

The blame game

Geraldine Morris examines where the fault lies for wasted costs

 

In Fisher Meredith v JH and PH (Financial Remedy: Appeal: Wasted Costs) [2012] All ER (D) 157 (Mar), the appellant firm appealed a wasted costs order made in relation to an adjournment in a case which involved the complexity of several parties to the proceedings and evidence served at a very late stage prior to a final hearing.

In brief, the background to the case was that the final hearing of the wife’s claim in financial remedy proceedings was listed before a district judge and that, during the course of the proceedings, she had applied to set aside a transfer of shares from the husband to the second respondent, his aunt. There was a dispute as to the beneficial ownership of the shares.

Two days prior to the final hearing, the wife’s solicitors (the appellant in the wasted costs proceedings) were provided with a further 123 pages of documents by the second
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll