header-logo header-logo

29 March 2012
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Defamation—Qualified privilege—Public interest

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

 

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson SCJJ, 21 Mar 2012

The court considered the circumstances in which a defendant may be protected from liability to a claimant in defamation under the doctrine in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] 4 All ER 609.
 
James Price QC and William Bennett (instructed by Edwin Coe LLP) for the claimant. Richard Rampton QC, Heather Rogers QC and Kate Wilson (instructed by the Times Newspapers Legal Department) for the defendant.

The defendant newspaper published an article in June 2006 in which it accused the claimant, a detective sergeant of the extradition unit of the Metropolitan Police Service, of having taken money in exchange for passing information to a security firm. The article alleged that that information had been passed to Russian businessmen to forewarn them of extradition proceedings. A central aspect of the article was the statement that investigations
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll