header-logo header-logo

Defamation—Qualified privilege—Public interest

29 March 2012
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11, [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Mar)

 

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson SCJJ, 21 Mar 2012

The court considered the circumstances in which a defendant may be protected from liability to a claimant in defamation under the doctrine in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] 4 All ER 609.
 
James Price QC and William Bennett (instructed by Edwin Coe LLP) for the claimant. Richard Rampton QC, Heather Rogers QC and Kate Wilson (instructed by the Times Newspapers Legal Department) for the defendant.

The defendant newspaper published an article in June 2006 in which it accused the claimant, a detective sergeant of the extradition unit of the Metropolitan Police Service, of having taken money in exchange for passing information to a security firm. The article alleged that that information had been passed to Russian businessmen to forewarn them of extradition proceedings. A central aspect of the article was the statement that investigations
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll