header-logo header-logo

30 March 2012 / Toby Craig
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Moving forward?

The government has failed in its attempt to promote fairer, quicker & cheaper justice, says Toby Craig

It seems far longer than 16 months since the government published its consultation documents on the reform of legal aid and civil litigation in November 2010. At that stage, it was clear that change was in the pipeline, but we had little idea of how it would present itself legislatively. As we now near the end of that legislative process, it seems an opportune moment to look back over an extended period of lobbying and engagement, during which a host of campaign groups sought to provide a voice for the many women, children and vulnerable people who will lose out from these reforms.

After numerous and wide-ranging consultation responses were received and duly ignored, the government published its own response last June, simultaneously giving the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (or LASPO, the short-hand which is all too familiar to many battle-weary opponents) its first reading in the House of Commons. The Bill is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll