header-logo header-logo

30 March 2012 / Toby Craig
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Moving forward?

The government has failed in its attempt to promote fairer, quicker & cheaper justice, says Toby Craig

It seems far longer than 16 months since the government published its consultation documents on the reform of legal aid and civil litigation in November 2010. At that stage, it was clear that change was in the pipeline, but we had little idea of how it would present itself legislatively. As we now near the end of that legislative process, it seems an opportune moment to look back over an extended period of lobbying and engagement, during which a host of campaign groups sought to provide a voice for the many women, children and vulnerable people who will lose out from these reforms.

After numerous and wide-ranging consultation responses were received and duly ignored, the government published its own response last June, simultaneously giving the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (or LASPO, the short-hand which is all too familiar to many battle-weary opponents) its first reading in the House of Commons. The Bill is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll